Free Consult: 877-737-8525

News about stress urinary incontinence

Less invasive treatment available for urinary incontinence

Wednesday, May 15th, 2013

According to the Mayo Clinic, a number of treatment options for urinary incontinence are available, depending on the severity and underlying cause of the condition. Doctors may eventually recommend a combination of treatments.

But in most cases, doctors will recommend the least invasive approaches first.

Any surgical procedure carries inherent risks. And in the case of urinary incontinence, at least one surgical treatment allegedly causes far greater problems than the condition it’s meant to treat.

Transvaginal mesh implants, marketed as a treatment for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, have generated widespread lawsuits over their tendency to fail and cause health problems. The most common reported problem is the vaginal mesh eroding and sticking through the walls of the bladder and vagina, causing severe pain.

In the first of about 11,000 lawsuits against vaginal mesh manufacturers to go to trial, a New Jersey jury recently awarded $11.1 million to a woman who received a mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary. (more…)

Woman thought mesh would be easiest treatment

Saturday, May 11th, 2013

A report on News Channel 4 out of Oklahoma tells the story of a woman who received a vaginal mesh implant in the belief that it was the most advanced, minimally invasive technique available to cure her urinary incontinence.

Instead, she ended up in extreme pain, and trying unsuccessfully for three years to get the surgery necessary to remove the device. The story says she has joined hundred of other women from Oklahoma in seeking redress against the mesh’s manufacturers.

According to the story, “the outcome for some patients included the mesh tearing their body apart from the inside.”

Women throughout the country are taking similar legal action. In the first of about 11,000 of those lawsuits to go to trial, a New Jersey jury recently awarded $11.1 million to a woman who received a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary. (more…)

Plaintiff in mesh case supports European patients

Friday, May 10th, 2013

An American plaintiff awarded $11.1 million in court because of her injuries from a vaginal mesh implant is lending her support to women seeking similar legal redress in Scotland and the U.K., according to a story in the Scots paper Daily Record.

The story says scores of women in Scotland have also suffered ill effects from the devices, implanted to treat pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

The devices have generated thousands of complaints in recent years because of their tendency to erode and stick through the walls of the bladder and vagina. Recipients have reported problems including infection and debilitating pain.

The American plaintiff’s case, heard in New Jersey, was the first of about 11,000 lawsuits against vaginal mesh manufacturers to go to trial. (more…)

Mesh implants injure women in Scotland

Thursday, May 9th, 2013

A story in the Daily Record out of Scotland deals with the plight of Scots women injured after receiving vaginal mesh implants. Hundreds may be “suffering horrendous health problems” from the devices, which are implanted to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

The story notes that the implants have generated widespread complaints in the United States of causing health problems for patients who receive them.

“The recognized symptoms from vaginal mesh implants included abdominal and pelvic pain, urinary problems, painful sexual intercourse, vaginal scarring and mesh erosion,” the story says.

Almost 65,000 of the implant operations have been carried out in the U.K. in recent years, with more than 2600 removals. As many as 6000 Scots have undergone the surgery. (more…)

Mesh manufacturer feeling impact of lawsuit

Wednesday, April 24th, 2013

Bloomberg reports that Denmark-based vaginal mesh manufacturer Coloplast’s stock dropped the most in almost four years over concerns about lawsuits that patients injured by the implants have filed.

The story says a joint status conference is scheduled for lawsuits filed against vaginal mesh manufacturers including Coloplast, American Medical Systems Holdings Inc., CR Bard Inc. and Boston Scientific Corp.

The mesh implants are supposed to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, which is a condition that results when weakened muscles no longer provide adequate support for pelvic organs.

But they’ve generated widespread reports of health problems for patients who have received them, as well as about 11,000 lawsuits. Common complaints include infections, organ perforation and chronic pain so bad that patients are frequently compelled to give up sexual intercourse. (more…)

Column describes pelvic organ prolapse

Wednesday, April 17th, 2013

A column by local physician Christie Iverson, MD, in the Bismarck Tribune out of North Dakota describes pelvic organ prolapse. Iverson writes that the condition is basically what happens when a woman’s pelvic floor weakens and the vaginal walls protrude, or a weakened uterus descends into the vaginal canal.

According to Iverson, new technology for prolapse surgery known as sacrocolpopexy has made it possible for women to get it corrected “with minimal after effects,” leaving behind tiny incisions that heal quickly.

Aside from surgery, Iverson writes, the most common treatment is insertion of a supportive device known as a “pessary” into the vagina.

Other devices marketed for treatment in recent years have proven more problematic than the pelvic organ prolapse itself.

Transvaginal mesh implants, meant to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, have been the basis of widespread lawsuits due to their tendency to fail and cause health problems. The most common reported problem in these lawsuits is the vaginal mesh eroding and sticking through the walls of the bladder and vagina, causing severe pain. (more…)

Another legal decision against Ethicon

Sunday, April 14th, 2013

A judge recently ordered Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division to pay Irish health care products manufacturer Covidien $176.5 million in damages over a patent dispute, Bloomberg reports.

At the conclusion of a non-jury trial, U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton in New Haven, Conn., ruled that Ethicon infringed three U.S. patents for ultrasonic surgical instruments owned by Covidien.

Ethicon recently suffered another multi-million setback, in the form of an $11.1 million jury award to a woman injured by one of the company’s vaginal mesh implants. That case represented the first of more than 11,000 lawsuits regarding the devices to go to trial.

The vaginal mesh implants were marketed as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse. They’ve generated thousands of complaints of health problems, including infection, organ perforation and chronic pain. (more…)

Tests evaluate urinary incontinence

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

Urinary incontinence can have a number of causes, according to the Mayo Clinic. They run the gamut from temporary causes, such as medication or overhydration; to relatively minor conditions such as urinary tract infection; to relatively serious causes such as bladder cancer.

A number of tests are available to determine the underlying cause, the Mayo Clinic says.

Though it’s a frequently troublesome condition, it’s usually treatable. But some treatments can create problems of their own.

Transvaginal mesh implants, marketed as a treatment for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, have been the basis of widespread lawsuits due to their tendency to fail and cause health problems. The most common reported problem is the vaginal mesh eroding and sticking through the walls of the bladder and vagina, causing severe pain.

In the first of about 11,000 lawsuits against vaginal mesh manufacturers to go to trial, a New Jersey jury recently awarded $11.1 million to a woman who received a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary. (more…)

Mesh implant patient launches protest

Thursday, April 4th, 2013

CTV Network out of Canada reports on a Manitoba woman who is staging a protest about the vaginal mesh device she had implanted during a hysterectomy in January, 2012.

The report shows Christine of Winnipeg getting around with the assistance of a wheelchair and cane, and describes her as “a woman who says her life has been destroyed by the surgery and wants to stop it from happening to anyone else.”

Mesh implants, used to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, have generated widespread reports of health problems for women who received them. Common reported problems include chronic pain, infection and organ perforation.

In the first of about 11,000 lawsuits against vaginal mesh manufacturers to go to trial, a New Jersey jury recently awarded $11.1 million to a woman who received a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary. (more…)

Mesh jury awards $11.1m, says company failed to warn of risks

Friday, March 8th, 2013

Members of a New Jersey jury that awarded a total of $11.1 million to a woman who received a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary did not find a design defect, according to a lawyer for the plaintiff. But they did rule that the company failed to warn the plaintiff’s doctor of the hazards, and that patient brochures fraudulently misrepresented the procedure.

A story on the decision in Reuters says the plaintiff, a 47-year-old woman from South Dakota, was awarded $7.76 million in punitive damages from the company. The remaining $3.35 million is for compensation of medical expenses.

The plaintiff in the case testified that she had to undergo 18 operations, and still suffered chronic pain that forced her to give up her career as a nurse.

Vaginal mesh implants are supposed to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Although the New Jersey jury didn’t find a design defect, complaints about similarly designed devices are widespread. Thousands of patients who received them complain about health problems including chronic pain, organ perforation and infection. (more…)

Legal troubles for makers of vaginal mesh

Monday, March 4th, 2013

In a blog entry for the Philadelphia Inquirer, writer David Sell points out that two makers of problematic medical devices called vaginal mesh implants recently suffered significant setbacks on the same day.

A jury in Atlantic City awarded $7.8 million in punitive damages to a former nurse who claimed that chronic pain forced her to stop working and obliged her to undergo 18 operations. In her lawsuit, she claimed her health problems started after she was implanted with a mesh device made by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary.

Earlier in the week, the same jury had awarded her $3.5 million in compensatory damages.

And Endo Health Systems of Malvern, Pa., announced substantial losses on the same day. Those were due in part to a $640 million write down on the value of its American Medical Systems device division, which is focused on pelvic health problems including vaginal mesh implants.

The implants, used to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, have generated widespread complaints of health problems including chronic pain, infection and organ perforation. (more…)

Jury awards additional $7.76M in mesh case

Friday, March 1st, 2013

A New Jersey jury has awarded a plaintiff injured by a Johnson & Johnson vaginal mesh implant $7.76 million in punitive damages, in addition to the $3.35 million she was awarded days earlier, Reuters reports.

Lawyers for the plaintiff alleged that Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon, manufacturer of the Gyncare Prolift vaginal mesh, were liable for defective design, manufacture, warnings and instructions, among other things.

It was the first trial for 1,800 lawsuits involving the Ethicon implant alone. Thousands of other cases are pending for similar mesh products.

The implants are supposed to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, a condition that results when weakened muscles no longer provide adequate support for pelvic muscles.

Thousands of patients who received them complain that they tend to eventually poke holes in the pelvic organs, resulting in chronic pain and infection. They mesh also tends to harden, making surgical removal difficult. (more…)

$3.35M mesh award gets international attention

Thursday, February 28th, 2013

A New Jersey jury’s decision to award $3.35 million to a woman who was injured by one of Johnson & Johnson’s vaginal mesh implants is getting international attention, according to a story on CTV News out of Canada.

The jury’s decision came at the end of the first trial in thousands of lawsuits involving the device, manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division.

The vaginal mesh implant is supposed to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, a condition in which weakened muscles no longer provide adequate support for the pelvic organs. Thousands of patients have complained that it protrudes through the pelvic organ tissue, causing chronic pain and infection.

The story quotes a lawyer who is representing Canadian clients in a lawsuit as saying the New Jersey decision is a “bellwether trial” that bodes well for future cases.

“It tells us that we are doing the right thing in moving ahead with our cases,” the lawyer says. (more…)

Mesh verdict the first of 4,000 cases

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

According to a story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, a woman awarded $3.35 million in a case against Johnson & Johnson over the company’s vaginal mesh implant represents the first trial of 1,200 similar lawsuits in New Jersey – where Johnson & Johnson is based.

But the total number of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson over vaginal mesh implants made by the company’s Ethicon subsidiary is closer to 4,000.

Vaginal mesh implants are supposed to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, which is a condition that results when weakened muscles provide inadequate support for pelvic organs. Neither condition is life-threatening, and alternative treatments are available for both.

In an entry on the verdict that an Atlantic City jury awarded this week, blogger David Sell notes that the plaintiff underwent 18 unsuccessful repair surgeries to try to alleviate the chronic pain she suffered as a result of receiving the implant.

“Read that again,” Sell writes. “18 unsuccessful repair surgeries.”

(more…)

Jury awards $3.5 million in vaginal mesh case

Monday, February 25th, 2013

A New Jersey jury has awarded a woman $3.5 million in the first verdict of more than 2,100 lawsuits over a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon unit, Bloomberg reports.

Linda Gross of South Dakota, the 47-year-old plaintiff, said she needed 18 operations after receiving the device, and had to quit her nursing job because of the chronic pain that it caused her.

Such complaints are rampant about the vaginal mesh devices, implanted to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, a condition in which weakened muscles can no longer adequately support the pelvic organs. Common complaints include the devices becoming exposed through the vaginal skin, causing pain and infection.

Gross’s lawyer said the device also tends to harden in women’s bodies, making it difficult to remove.

The jury agreed with her lawyer’s allegations that Ethicon knew about the problems with the implant, yet failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risks.

(more…)

Find out if you have a case

Complete the form below and an attorney will review your information and provide a free case evaluation.

Se habla español

Subscribe to RSS

Lopez McHugh LLP

California Office
100 Bayview Circle
Suite 5600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(877) 737-8525 - Toll Free
(949) 737-1501
(949) 737-1504 - Fax

New Jersey Office
712 E. Main Street
Suite 2A
Moorestown, NJ 08057
(856) 273-8500
(856) 273-8502 - Fax

Pennsylvania Office
1123 Admiral Peary Way
Quarters K
Philadelphia, PA 19112
(877) 703-7070 - Toll Free
(215) 952-6910
(215) 952-6914 - Fax

Key Cases:

Popular Topics:

anti-coagulant, antidepressant, asbestos, Bayer, Benzene, Beyaz, birth defects, blood clots, Byetta, cancer, carcinogen, complications, debris, DePuy, diabetes, early failure, erosion, FDA, Fracking, hip implants, hydraulic fracturing, implants, Januvia, Johnson & Johnson, Marcellus Shale, Meningitis, mesh contraction, mesothelioma, metal-on-metal, multidistrict litigation, New England Compounding Center, Ocella, organ perforation, outbreak, pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, pelvic organ prolapse, Pradaxa, pulmonary embolism, septal heart defects, SSRI, steroids, stress urinary incontinence, thyroid cancer, transvaginal mesh, Traumatic brain injury, vaginal scarring, Yasmin, Yaz, Zoloft